Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Constantinus Maximus
Paxian Expeditionary Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 05:22:00 -
[1]
lol just kinda amazing how out-of-touch CCP are.
Oh well I guess when they make Eve an easy to maintain simple little game for kids they can relax instead of working so hard for nothing.
|

Constantinus Maximus
Paxian Expeditionary Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 06:03:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Tres Farmer CCP you're a bunch of liars.
They seem to be confirming this with unprecedented regularity recently.
|

Constantinus Maximus
Paxian Expeditionary Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 06:39:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Constantinus Maximus on 15/06/2011 06:42:01
Originally by: Estephania When accountants take over the company the business dies. It is especially true for niche game as Eve which was never supposed to bring in millions of subscribers.
Exactly. Setting a subscriber target for mass-appeal on a very strong niche product.... Just why... Why kill a niche product with dreams of mass-market.
That article on WoW which showed how to make more money by making your game dumber has a lot to answer for.
edit: That being said, EveOnline is a crappy business. $14.95/mo and SOOOO much work. Compare that to running a **** site or other subscription business with comparable churn rate, twice the revenue and near zero work.
|

Constantinus Maximus
Paxian Expeditionary Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 07:12:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Mister Smithington 2) It's deplorable that the CSM let this get through. A two week test is acceptable? It's acceptable in the way that just a few seconds of raep is acceptable. On this issue the CSM failed to represent the community and failed to protect the sandbox. Shame.
It seems more likely that CCP miss-represented the CSMs position.
|

Constantinus Maximus
Paxian Expeditionary Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 07:23:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Constantinus Maximus on 15/06/2011 07:23:38
Originally by: Ciar Meara
Originally by: CCP Zinfandel
The CSM didn't like the idea of selling a whole ship, but they could live with a one week test.
This is indeed "not remembering correctly" they DIDN'T want this but they could "live" with one week test...that's as big as a diplomatic PLEASE NO as you can get!
Funny how poorly that reads. Didn't even pay attention to the CSM enough to remember that they had said anything.
Then to say they could live with a week just reads as "Whatever dude, you're not listening, do whatever the **** you like to kill the game"
CCP is clearly showing their stripes, it's over people.
|

Constantinus Maximus
Paxian Expeditionary Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 07:25:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Mister Smithington
Originally by: Constantinus Maximus
Originally by: Mister Smithington 2) It's deplorable that the CSM let this get through. A two week test is acceptable? It's acceptable in the way that just a few seconds of raep is acceptable. On this issue the CSM failed to represent the community and failed to protect the sandbox. Shame.
It seems more likely that CCP miss-represented the CSMs position.
Two CSM members in this very thread confirmed that they thought a week or two would do no damage and would be acceptable. I'll dig up the quotes if I have to.
I'm sure there are 1 or 2 who don't care. The statements show a broken process before what "he said she said" comes into it though.
|

Constantinus Maximus
Paxian Expeditionary Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.17 01:25:00 -
[7]
CCP lied to customers? No neva! lol
A ship is not a vanity item, I think that is fairly clear.
|

Constantinus Maximus
Paxian Expeditionary Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.17 05:48:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Tres Farmer
If CCP thinks they don't need this implemented correctly (read: the hard and clean way) so that they have it easier down the road.. their bad.
Like everything else they've done in the last 2 years.
|
|
|